to shut people up its next season no one cares

Well, then maybe give us a point deduction in season 3?

Best post in the thread from Jonny by a mile. It still doesn't explain why if TIS refuse the replay NL get a deduction. The result should stand if a replay is refused, otherwise NL are getting punished for something which isn't proven. Replaying and removing the doubt is the best option in my opinion, based on the information which is now available, but wasn't previously.

How some admins can expect others not to get the wrong end of the stick when they don't release all the information is beyond me.

Why people comment on something they don't fully understand is beyond me.

aeRo wrote:Why people comment on something they don't fully understand is beyond me.

When an admin releases a statement such as the one Rachel did, one expects it to contain the full facts.

opc wrote:

aeRo wrote:Why people comment on something they don't fully understand is beyond me.

When an admin releases a statement such as the one Rachel did, one expects it to contain the full facts.

Cool

The team hasn't actually done anything wrong and they won the game fairly. If Girg has admitted intent, surely you should be throwing 50 shades of shit at him?

The game was played and won fair and square and would likely be that way again, a waste of time. Girg deliberately set out to find someone to impersonate and should be given an individual punishment.

Given that Girg admitted to it, the punishment should be chopped down.

i dont understand y nl get -3 points if ti refuse either tbh

explain pls

all irrelevant

ovo turned down replay - will discuss another form of punishment