Maddude wrote:Because the 2nd half they played with their strongest line-up and was the first half the incident happened?

Ghost wrote:

Mick wrote:I'm with Aidan. Pausing to get the phone is ludicrous, especially in an FM league game. I don't even pick up the phone when I'm watching the TV and it's literally a few metres away. The second half should be replayed however, not the whole game. ( and play from 2-0)

Probably the most sensible thing posted in this thread so far. The same lineups must also be used.

Aidan wrote:momo i swear to god you are retarded

OvoXo wrote:To give back a goal that was never scored. Ridiculous.

To be 100% certain Fabien would have scored that goal is ridiculous too. No offence to Fabien, but you were poor through out the game, and you're not exactly world class striker. So anything could have happened.

Also If you scored that goal, it wouldn't be fair play.

What your players should have done is stopped when nino,beast and juhc stopped. They clearly saw it and aren't blind. If you failed to play fair then I should fail to play fair as well, and not give you back a re-match or a goal.

Honestly if your players stopped, then we ALL would have come to a mutual agreement to pause the game.

To score a goal when 3/4 players stopped and then claim it WOULD have gone in is daft.

Its a shame this happened tbh

Aidan wrote:The pause gave the keeper time to react and it made fab nervous so he hit it to early ie the soft kick

OvoXo wrote:

Ghost wrote:

Mick wrote:I'm with Aidan. Pausing to get the phone is ludicrous, especially in an FM league game. I don't even pick up the phone when I'm watching the TV and it's literally a few metres away. The second half should be replayed however, not the whole game. ( and play from 2-0)

Probably the most sensible thing posted in this thread so far. The same lineups must also be used.

1. Nino didn't pause. I wasn't gonna pause because it was a breach of the rules.
2. He had to attend an phone call which clearly is a priority over playing haxball, unless you're a sad cunt and would rather play a game than ignore a family member calling you.
3. Replaying the game second half from 2-0 is basically what happened in the second half? So we're giving them an extra 7 minutes to get 2 goals back or more?

There aren't many options to go around this. They're all tough

1. Re-play 2nd half from 2-0, but then that happened in the second half?
2. Re-play 2nd half from 2-1, but give them a goal that never went in
3. Re-play the whole game, but lose the 2 goals we scored fair and square
4. Allow them to have a 2v1 attack, which shouldn't be the case as it wouldn't happen if everyone stopped.

Like seriously. If a player is down, do you not think to yourself lets stop playing? Have some decency to be fair?

If one of your players is down and we're in attack. I would stop the game no matter how close we are to the goal and how much bollocking I'd get and if we scored give 1 back.

To be honest only reason you carried on playing is cause you were down by 2 goals. Then you say we're allowed to carry on playing because there is no rule. Which is true, but then this clearly shows your desperate need to get a goal back and throw away moral sportsmanship in the game by playing unfairly.

I don't know it's a sticky situation

opc wrote:That's a ridiculous decision to be honest. Trying to save face of an admin over being fair. Absolutely ridiculous.

opc wrote:Except this decision isn't worth millions of pounds to specific football associations.
Time and time again people attempt to draw parallels between football and haxball and it's fucking stupid.

Donny wrote:To be fair you can't really replay it, if you do then you're punishing TI Sparta for it. There's no fair way around it.

juhc wrote:lol dm should be happy with the result, spartas chief crew would have hurt u alot more.

Éver wrote:

juhc wrote:lol dm should be happy with the result, spartas chief crew would have hurt u alot more.