Fantasy Football 12/13 season

Bitches be jealous.
Having centre backs as your defenders is fucking stupid.

opc, wtf?

Have you ever played fantasy football before?

By the way the aim is to win by scoring goals, getting assists and clean sheets, that means you have to get a good goalkeeper *ahem* Hart and not give captaincy to an un-tested newcomer who has never played in the Premier League and is also a midfielder.

While I'm at it, why have you got the worst two strikers possible to lead your line, Torres and Crouch?
and
Who dafuq is McCartney


Kthxbye

opc wrote:Bitches be jealous.
Having centre backs as your defenders is fucking stupid.

amateur. CB get goals from set pieces all the time - luiz, terry etc etc etc

STEVO12188™©® wrote:opc, wtf?

Have you ever played fantasy football before?

By the way the aim is to win by scoring goals, getting assists and clean sheets, that means you have to get a good goalkeeper *ahem* Hart and not give captaincy to an un-tested newcomer who has never played in the Premier League and is also a midfielder.

While I'm at it, why have you got the worst two strikers possible to lead your line, Torres and Crouch?
and
Who dafuq is McCartney


Kthxbye

Vorm was 8 points behind Hart through the whole of last season yet is worth 1.5m less in FF, I'd say that's pretty good. And especially considering Swansea play QPR in the first match, I'd say a clean sheet is likely.

17 goals and 10 assists for the Bundesliga and German Cup champions is hardly un-tested. He's going to be a hit.

Torres WILL have a good season. The reason Chelsea have bought a load of attacking midfielders rather than a new striker is because Torres is going to start and they're giving him better delivery. With Hazard on a wing/as an AM there is no chance he won't score 15+ goals this season. Crouch scored 130 points last season, the 10th best, and is worth just 6.5. Allowed me, along with some other sacrifices, to get Kagawa, Hazard and Toure all in my midfield.

McCartney is just a bloke I picked because he was cheap. I'll swap him out for a defender for one of the new teams once I've done some research.

And Skillem, CBs get a lot more cards than full backs. I'm going for the assists with these bad boys. I've just swapped out Cole for Evra, who was the top scoring defender last season.

why have people got kagawa and hazard?

opc wrote:

STEVO12188 wrote:opc, wtf?

Have you ever played fantasy football before?

By the way the aim is to win by scoring goals, getting assists and clean sheets, that means you have to get a good goalkeeper *ahem* Hart and not give captaincy to an un-tested newcomer who has never played in the Premier League and is also a midfielder.

While I'm at it, why have you got the worst two strikers possible to lead your line, Torres and Crouch?
and
Who dafuq is McCartney


Kthxbye

Vorm was 8 points behind Hart through the whole of last season yet is worth 1.5m less in FF, I'd say that's pretty good. And especially considering Swansea play QPR in the first match, I'd say a clean sheet is likely.

17 goals and 10 assists for the Bundesliga and German Cup champions is hardly un-tested. He's going to be a hit.

Torres WILL have a good season. The reason Chelsea have bought a load of attacking midfielders rather than a new striker is because Torres is going to start and they're giving him better delivery. With Hazard on a wing/as an AM there is no chance he won't score 15+ goals this season. Crouch scored 130 points last season, the 10th best, and is worth just 6.5. Allowed me, along with some other sacrifices, to get Kagawa, Hazard and Toure all in my midfield.

McCartney is just a bloke I picked because he was cheap. I'll swap him out for a defender for one of the new teams once I've done some research.

And Skillem, CBs get a lot more cards than full backs. I'm going for the assists with these bad boys. I've just swapped out Cole for Evra, who was the top scoring defender last season.

You can't say for sure that Swansea will keep a clean sheet and you need a reliable, tested GK like Hart who has played consistently well. But, fair enough with last season's points total.

As for Crouch, why don't you look up the list of strikers, 10th isn't exactly the best you could have got. Before you hit me with the money argument, Danny Graham, an experienced striker and Grant Holt, a consistent CF are placed 6th and 7th respectively in the list of strikers and Graham is even cheaper than Crouch. Why not get him and save some money if you want to play that way?

Regarding Kagawa, any new, foreign player coming into the premier league who has never played in it before is doubtful. I know you have the Carlos Tevezs, Sergio Agueros and Van Nistelrooys but what about the Balotellis, Dzekos and Shevchenkos. These were all players of outstanding talent when they came into the premier league and look what they did. They flopped. How do you know that Kagawa isn't going to be the same, how CAN you know?

Maybe Chelsea will play the Spain way with lots of creative midfielders and no striker, I seem to remember as a Liverpool fan that Torres is no good on his own upfield. Even if he does play and he doesn't play badly, how do you know he will have a fantastic season. Obviously no-one is un-questionable and without question, but there are more consistent players than the ones you have chosen.

As for picking Full-backs over centre backs, why didn't you get a mix of both - assists and goals. And your statement about getting cards is completely wrong. Dani Alves - snm.

Anyway, if your team works out then it will be good and if it does, congrats.

Good luck.

Holt and Graham won't be as good as last season. I think Vorm will be.

I can't know anything, I'm making educated judgements. That's what this game is partly based on. Either way, this is just my first draft. It'll change an awful lot as I study pre-season.

changed again lol, more switching than Rafael Benitez's managerial policy.

Anyways......

Have changed two of my defenders, Enrique and Coloccini out for Assou-Ekotto and Simpson.

Mick wrote:why have people got kagawa and hazard?

Because they cost a lot, innit?

Either that or because their good players

opc wrote:Holt and Graham won't be as good as last season. I think Vorm will be.

I can't know anything, I'm making educated judgements. That's what this game is partly based on. Either way, this is just my first draft. It'll change an awful lot as I study pre-season.

Partly!?!?!? That's all it's based on!

Trying to do my team at the moment. It's like Sophie's choice; I can't decide!

Bumpin to get more people to join.

Éver wrote:

Mick wrote:why have people got kagawa and hazard?

Because they cost a lot, innit?

Either that or because their good players

opc wrote:Holt and Graham won't be as good as last season. I think Vorm will be.

I can't know anything, I'm making educated judgements. That's what this game is partly based on. Either way, this is just my first draft. It'll change an awful lot as I study pre-season.

Partly!?!?!? That's all it's based on!

Trying to do my team at the moment. It's like Sophie's choice; I can't decide!

ever my nig nig kaga and hazard gon do nuffin dis ssn believ me on dis

In, will do tomorrow or so.

Hnnghh

Jones is pretty risky, doubt he's gonna start. Will probs be Rafael or Valencia at right back. And your midfield is really weak tbh.

gg

ok, changed my team again,

this time, thanks go to TTom for making me see sense and actually do some research instead of blindly going for the same old players, so thanks

GK-Cech sub Cerny

Def-Williams, Coloccini, Shawcross,, Warnock and Walker

Mid-N-Zogbia, Toure, Hazard, Sigurdsson and Diarra

St-Torres, Tevez and Graham

4-3-3 Formation

Cya!!

ez

fap wrote:

ez

Yeah, not if those 2 players do a no-show on you.

dats what subs are for

and they will be playin anyway

they'll play, first game of the season and they're both 75%

My latest edit

1453498-363097

LAD-BIBLE code

win 200 quid of beer if you win

lol nice poverty team joe

song's going to barca??

SNM

0 points so far, made big changes

w00000t, second atm

only seedstitch are better


^unfortunately, i don't get to say that often