Keeper wiv a sweepin brush innit.

Sweeper 'keeper is you Trolex

Yes I agree cath + ed the challenge as a 4v4 gk is alot higher than 3v3
I just prefer gking in 3's more since you are more involved in the attack, you can come up to support the attack and in 4v4 it really isn't possible since you have to stay in your half for most of the game - same to C

Goalkeeping in 3v3 is like playing DM in 4v4.

don't mind gking on 4v4 as long as it is on Big i am not fat enough to cover the whole big ez goal :S
I am actually an offensive mid when it comes to 4v4 anyways like playing there boring in goal

in 4v4 it really isn't possible since you have to stay in your half for most of the game - same to C

Mmm, no.

I join in the anti 4vs4 colective XD

Girgensons wrote:

in 4v4 it really isn't possible since you have to stay in your half for most of the game - same to C

Mmm, no.

Ok maybe a little bit ahead your half way line if you want everything explained to you

Mick wrote:

Girgensons wrote:

in 4v4 it really isn't possible since you have to stay in your half for most of the game - same to C

Mmm, no.

Ok maybe a little bit ahead your half way line if you want everything explained to you

The GK is the most important player in 4on4. He's the first to defend and usually the first player to get the ball when the attack has failed and your team is trying to maintain posession.

I don't remember seeing a good team that plays with a static GK - it's a waste of a player. So I can't see how you're not involved in the attack. Yes, you don't get to make the shot on goal, but in that respect there's pretty much no difference between a defender/GK in 3on3 or a GK in 4on4 (given that the teams play with no rotation).

Girgensons wrote:

Mick wrote:

Girgensons wrote:

in 4v4 it really isn't possible since you have to stay in your half for most of the game - same to C

Mmm, no.

Ok maybe a little bit ahead your half way line if you want everything explained to you

The GK is the most important player in 4on4. He's the first to defend and usually the first player to get the ball when the attack has failed and your team is trying to maintain posession.

I don't remember seeing a good team that plays with a static GK - it's a waste of a player. So I can't see how you're not involved in the attack. Yes, you don't get to make the shot on goal, but in that respect there's pretty much no difference between a defender/GK in 3on3 or a GK in 4on4 (given that the teams play with no rotation).

ITS ALL ABOUT ROTAATIONNN ITS ALL ABOUT ROTAATIONNN ITS ALL ABOUT ROTAATIONNN

Then the defensive unit is much faster at doing their job - which is taking the possession back from your opponents - when they rotate.

GKERS ARE THE COMMANDING DEF/MIDFIELDER!

This is haxball science